What is the principle of social morality in psychodiagnosis?

In the conduct of psychological diagnosis, a specialist must adhere to ethical rules, which are reflected in the international code of the practical psychologist. The principle of social morality includes both the responsibility of the psychologist for the qualitative conducting of the diagnosis, and the provision to the researched person of a positive state both in the process of research and in further practical work based on the results of the diagnosis.

In the course of studying psychodiagnostics, students of psychological specialties, first of all, study what is the principle of objectivity and reliability, since The quality of the result of the research depends on the quality of the selection of diagnostic techniques. Objectivity of psychological methods of diagnostics is achieved due to their development by groups of scientists, their testing on a large number of subjects and published in scientific publications with the indication of the key to the test results.

The principle of social morality presupposes the diagnosis as a result of psychodiagnostics in terms of the number of scores received as a result of answering questions, choosing judgments that are most valuable to the subject, or by the number of significant signs that relate to a particular condition of the researcher. Therefore, the measurement principle is additionally used, when in the study of non-physical objects the digital symbolization of the studied properties is used. So, for example, in the study of child aggressiveness, the researcher conducts the methodology "Frequency count", when the observation of the object is carried out for several days with the calculation of the observed phenomenon in the behavior of the child. This will make it possible not only to calculate the number of aggressive acts, but also to analyze in what situations and under what conditions the observed situations occur.

For any specialist, it is important to understand what is the principle of confidentiality, which is the main ethical principle in the conduct of psychological, pedagogical, and social diagnostics. If a person himself refers to a specialist for diagnosis, then the results are reported only to him, and not to his relatives or co-workers.

Even for the conduct of scientific research, the principles of morality are used, which hide names, professions and other information about subjects on which it would be possible to guess who the information is about. In the scientific work, each subject is indicated by a letter or figure, and the rest of the information is kept by the researcher in the archive.

Diagnosis, in addition to its research function, should carry a shaping effect, ie, Give the individual new knowledge that helps the researcher to better understand his characteristics without harming himself and his mental state. The results of the diagnosis should not be used to collect the dossier for a person, to justify his incompetence in the profession. On the contrary, any diagnostic procedure should be used to develop the personality.

Each specialist must constantly improve his qualifications and pass the course preparation in order not only to supplement his knowledge of new techniques, but also to increase his competence, to be guided by what is the principle of undiminished harm or voluntariness, or the principle of scientific validity.

Training in the field of education professionals in order to confirm or improve their professional qualifications. The psychologist can go to the certification before the scheduled time, if he developed his own program, project or diagnosis, which he successfully applied in practice, if positive results were obtained in the education and upbringing of children. In his analytical report, a psychologist can describe what the principle of professional cooperation is, when diagnostics are developed, tested and perfected by a group of colleagues. It is this kind of collective cooperation that allows psychodiagnostics to remain socially moral, moral, objective and reliable for all participants in the research process.