How to write a review competently? Sample of a review of articles

Before talking about what is a sample review of the articles, I would like to talk about the genre itself. After all, only knowing its specifics and understanding its features, it will be possible to write a really literate journalistic work.

Review as an analytical genre

If you draw a parallel between this genre and some other, then for comparison, in this case, the detailed annotation is best. They have quite similar tasks. Both the abstract and the review are meant to tell the reader what is involved in a particular work (a play, a film, an article) than it is interesting, what features are noteworthy. This genre also has something in common with the literary critical article, since the writer is obliged to have his own opinion, his idea, to be able to correctly explain the essence of the work and bring it to readers. This is not a review, for which only impressions from reading or viewing are enough. The review is a multifaceted, complex and interesting genre. It is necessary to be able to work in it. And so it is important to study more than one sample of the review of articles, so that you can learn to apply theoretical skills in practice.

Components of the review

So, we should consider what the review consists of. In the role of its object is an artistic phenomenon, which is created by some kind of art. In this case, a review of an article from the journal is considered, so that it will be the journalistic work that will help to write it. That is, the phenomenon of mass communication. The article on which you must write a review is an object. Now about the main tasks. The author should not only submit an article, he must evaluate it, and from all sides, if possible. This is the main specificity of this genre - to consider the article from all points of view. This multidimensionality determines the complexity of the review. Such a goal in front of him poses unless the review (in terms of the genre). It is important that the author is able to correctly correlate the information aspect with the analytical, the objective - with the subjective. If all this is observed, then, you can say, half the genre features are taken into account.

How to make a review

After you have considered the main features of the genre, you can proceed to the main part. Namely, to the question of how to write a review of an article. This is a very important issue. And it is best to give a sample of a review of the articles for clarity, describing the sequence of presentation of the author's thoughts on paper. The first thing is the title of the article, the name of its author. After that - a description of the issues and the main problems, which the journalist tells about in his work. It is worth noting that the sample of the review for a scientific article differs somewhat from the one by which reviewers work, describing journal or newspaper publications. However, the differences are small. If scientific work is considered, it is necessary to indicate affiliation along with the name of the article, as well as regalia. The third item is the degree of relevance of the work, and then - the definition of the most important aspects of the publication. And finally, conclusions about everything that was said by the reviewer. Complete the publication of information about the person who is the author of the review: the place of his work, academic degree, rank, name, stamp, and signature.

Stylistic features

After the sample review of the articles was considered, you need to pay attention to the subtleties of the writing process. Many find it difficult to begin to present their idea, however, guided by some tips and the example above, you can write really sensible work. Many beginning journalists are concerned about how to write a review of the article. To begin with, you should follow some advice from experienced reviewers. In the text it is advised to use such phrases as "in the article the author pays attention to such aspects as ..." or "he correctly analyzes and rightly notes ..." etc. Such phrases can not only bind sentences among themselves, but also start New paragraph. After all, each such phrase implies development: the reviewer can write about how the author perceives the story, how he describes it, what techniques he uses, how rich his speech is, whether it abounds in comparisons and comparisons. To write this kind of work well, you need to feel yourself as a reviewer, because only so you can understand the whole essence of the written and how to best convey it to the reader.

Conclusion and conclusions

The review is a very important part in any journalistic work. The author is obliged to systematize and generalize all of the above to them, and as clearly and briefly as possible. The conclusion is best to start with the words: "Based on all that has been said, it can be argued that ...", and then directly to give a conclusion whether the article is informative and useful for the reader, is it clear whether the author has stated the essence, whether volume or not, how good his style is Writing. In a word - everything is summed up and put, therefore, a point.