What should be the response of the supervisor

The recall of the scientific adviser is important in any case. But especially it is needed if it is necessary to assess the level of performance of various types of research work. If student work is offered for any competition, then in the list of attached papers this review takes the first place along with reviews and acts of implementation. The importance of this document is not in anyone's doubt. After all, only the head of scientific work can adequately assess the degree of participation of the nominee for this or that scientific award in the conducted research work and evaluate the personal qualities of the applicant.

The response of the scientific adviser is written in an arbitrary form, but it must necessarily reflect the main points. At the very beginning it is written, to whose work it is given, the name of the work is necessarily given. Most often, the above text is made in the form of a title and is highlighted in bold. Then the text itself of this document goes directly, the content of which by definition should be positive. It does not make sense to submit a job for the competition, according to which even the manager has serious comments. Before proceeding to describe the document, the manager should characterize his author, noting his propensity to research, making independent decisions, the ability to work independently with literature. The review of the supervisor should also include a list of what the student did and what results he could achieve. This will help the reviewer to get an idea of the work done and its scientific potential. Therefore, it will be nice if the head describes the possible scope of the results obtained. Especially it is worth noting the presence of acts of implementation, if they have a nominee.

The review of the supervisor for a thesis has a title similar to the one described above, but the main text usually begins with the words that a scientific degree applicant is engaged in research work from a student's bench and for all time has proved to be an exceptionally educated and erudite person. Then other positive qualities of the applicant are listed. The head should also note what the thesis is devoted to, what theoretical and experimental studies its author was engaged in, what results, from the scientific point of view, he was able to achieve. Considering that this scientific work is individual, it is worth noting that all the tasks assigned within the framework of the conducted research were solved by the applicant independently. Of great importance is the degree of published results. It is necessary to indicate in what quantity the author of the work took part in the conference, it is worth noting the number of published articles, theses, reports. At the very end of the review, the supervisor should note that the applicant deserves the award of a scientific degree in the chosen specialty.

The manager's response to the thesis begins in a similar way and should contain an assessment of the result of the graduate's activities. Here it is worth noting that the student is able to use literature and is able to solve any tasks assigned to him. It should be noted that it was necessary to do in the diploma project, and what method of solving this problem the author of the diploma preferred.

Thus, any review by the supervisor should describe the work itself, the results achieved and the future directions for further research. Also in it it is necessary to characterize the author himself as a promising scientist, capable of performing various research works independently.