How to evaluate the best qualities of people

Each of us wants to be good in the eyes of others. What does it mean? How and when are the best qualities of people manifested and can they base their opinions on them?

They say that Peter the Great conducted such a test for his troops: before the formation he slapped a recruit. If he blushed and fell into anger, it was believed that he would be a good soldier. If, however, pale and was ready to lose consciousness, that is, anger and resentment paralyzed him, he was unsuitable for service. What are the best qualities of people manifest in conditions of stress? Willingness to accept a challenge, stand up for oneself, for one's ideals is an absolute virtue. But let's imagine a similar situation in peacetime in a civilized Europeanized society. Is it possible to check the best qualities of people in this way? Will behavior that demonstrates subordination and the ability to restrain one's emotions be considered more appropriate? After all, readiness for constant struggle can be perceived as a pathology, as an anomaly of character.

The best qualities of people are evaluated most often in their attitude towards themselves similar and weaker. But imagine a very kind man who is not able to protest or offend anyone, who likes to take care of children, is economic, knows how to cook ... It would seem that this is an ideal. But can he effectively and successfully lead the team, will he be able to realize his professional potential? No, in a society he will soon cause ridicule and condescending smiles. And at work, he quickly find a replacement. Therefore, the best qualities of people should always be perceived depending on the situation.

Will there be willingness to sacrifice virtue? Looking at what case. In the current canon, one who is willing to sacrifice his life to save another, is a worthy person. But let's imagine the situation "in its entirety". Suppose saving someone else's child, such a person dies, leaving a large family without support and support. The fact that he did not think about himself and his duty towards his children is dignity or weakness? The best qualities of people can be assessed from different ethical positions. For some, these are the properties that will enable them to bring up healthy and strong offspring, and protect them. For others - it's spiritual subtlety, sensitivity, impressionability. In each of us there are many makings, features, which, depending on a particular situation, can develop or decay.

Perhaps there is no single ideal. The conditioning of concrete situations is particularly evident if we want to select the good qualities of a person for a resume. Depending on which position We pretend to emphasize and develop various properties of character. Kindness and love for children will be undoubted advantages if a person wants to work in the field of medicine, pedagogy. However, for an engineer or storekeeper in production, these qualities will be insignificant. There will be much more useful accuracy, honesty, professional training.

Imagine that we were asked to create a list of 100 good qualities of a person. What exactly and in what order we will include in it, depends on our attitudes, on the position in society, on the properties of the character. For one virtue will be courage, courage, the ability to make quick decisions. For the other - sensitivity, empathy, kindness. No matter how much we argue, the best qualities of a person are always a situationally conditioned category.