Who are the radicals? Radicals of Russia and Ukraine, who are they?

The analysis of any concept must begin with the definition of terms. The meaning of the name is closely related to the realization of the phenomenon in society.

What does "radical" mean

The word is known from the school program. Everyone knows that this term denotes a root. Extracting it is a qualitative change. By analogy with the question of who such radicals are, the answer is: people who are striving for change. In fact, in politics, everyone wants some kind of change. Radicals differ from others in methods of achieving goals. They call for actions similar to root extraction, rapid and irreversible. In chemistry, this term is also used. A free radical is an element that is not associated with the rest. Analogy in politics is an independent, independent game, reluctance to keep in touch with other forces. Characteristic for radicals is the complete absence of tolerance. To tolerate dissent is not their method.

Principles of Radicals

Change at any cost is their main idea. Radicals are people who do not want to put up with the existing order of things. Compromises do not suit them, they do not want to negotiate. In the pursuit of a better life there is nothing wrong. On the contrary, it is very positive and useful. The essence of the methods. They can be smooth and painless, then the desired changes occur gradually, the society has time to restructure and get used to other orders. There are also revolutionary methods, when the old is rapidly breaking down and creating a new one on its ruins. It is clear that at this moment the people suffer and suffer hardships. The latter type of action is characteristic of radicals. They act decisively, uncompromisingly.

Examples of radical action

This current exists in almost any society. To better understand who these radicals are, you can consider a vivid example. During the well-known events in Ukraine, political forces showed themselves quite frankly. So, the radical right-wing fighters of the Right sector did not act decisively. At a time when other protesters were ready to compromise with the authorities, they announced their intention to bring the events to a victorious end. All the declared requirements of the Maidan by the President of Ukraine were satisfied. It seemed that the protest was exhausted. There was not a single idea left to detain the people on the Maidan. And then the Right sector appears, not going to leave the square! All confrontation goes into the next phase. The radicals of Ukraine continued their intentions. Following their ideology, they do not take into account the existence of other views, positions, opinions in this rather big country. These are the general principles of this trend.

The danger of radical views

The demonstrative absence of a desire to reckon with dissent is not limited to this current. Arguing about who such radicals are, one should speak about their attitude towards armed struggle. She is welcome, even more so. Radicals consider the armed resistance of the authorities (opposition, opponents and so on) the most effective method of conversation. To achieve the goal, all means are good. An automaton or a fist, a rocket or a knife - everything is applicable. The opponent should not be persuaded, but forced. In politics, the primacy of radical views in society inevitably leads to war. If the opponent is a different state, then to the predatory one, if the inhabitants of his country, then to the civil one. For example, the events in Libya clearly showed how the right-wing radicals plunged the state into a devastating endless war.

Russian radicals

In a multinational country, extreme views always find a suitable ground for themselves. Radical Islamists operate by methods of religiously motivated armed violence. The basis of Bacchabism was the broader Islamic trend - Salafism. Russian radicals, in fact, are part of this worldwide trend. His fans are fighting for the return of all Muslims to the monotheism that their ancestors had. All other currents of this religion, which arose later, must cease to exist. Thus, the activities of the Bacchabits lead to the emergence of an atmosphere of religious intolerance in society. It should be noted that there is no unanimity in the movement itself. Some of the groups deny the armed struggle, some consider it an extreme method. But the essence remains - their views do not recognize the existence of dissent, in this case - a different understanding of faith. Radical organizations began to shape their movement not immediately. It all began with small communities (jamaat). They were mostly young people. Inspired by Jamaat Santlad Bagauddin, a very colorful and charismatic person. He urged not to recognize the official clergy, criticizing him for departing from the true Islam.

The basis of radical organizations

One of the main problems of all political movements is the recruitment of adherents, that is, adherents. Radicals attract their supporters in various ways. So, often Islamic currents attract people with the most sincere help. Representatives of such movements conduct missionary activity. They are engaged in explaining their views, including who they are, what they are fighting for, and also provide humanitarian assistance to the most needy. It turns out that people who live on the verge of poverty, and even those who are dissatisfied with power, are at risk of joining radicals. In developing countries, the selection of "agents" is carried out by various funds. Mostly it goes unofficially. Unfortunately, often the development and financing of such movements has goals that are not ideological at all. For example, Islamic radicalism in Russia is created with a completely readable task: to undermine the country's economy towards the Caucasus.

The level of development of modern society allows you to abandon the methods of extreme radicalism. More often they are attracted to youth, unable to objectively assess the alignment of forces. Entering the ranks of the radicals, it is recommended to imagine well that bloody riots are not the best way to achieve progress. They are permissible only when there is no other way. And, as you know, the road is built by the going himself. How to use: word or machine, choose him - the creator of his life!