The film "I Spit on Your Graves 3": reviews, reviews, story, actors and roles

The cruel thriller horror "I spit on your graves 3" reviews critics have called an unexpectedly successful sequel to the acclaimed "torture" dilogy, somewhat surpassing the previous paintings.

Change of director

In the third part, which was released on October 1, 2015, RD Braunstein, who decides to break stereotypes around the franchise, comes to replace the favorite thrash-maker, director Stephen R. Monroe. Directed by RD Braunshtein is known to a narrow circle of viewers in his work in frankly scant "100 degrees below zero" (disaster film), which he filmed under the auspices of Asylum. The picture, according to the leading film critics, was not very successful, so the group of producers of the film "I Spit on Your Graves 3" reviewed them, but hoped for the law "you can not believe in stereotypes" and enabled RD Braunstein to justify himself in the eyes of the viewer. Producers have not lost, the third part in many points exceeds the previous two. The Monroe's monologue was a continuous rectilinear, with unfinished and unrealized makings. The work of Braunstein has a tense and more ramified plot, a more subtle system of vivid characters, entertaining individual episodes and a lot of ultra-violence. Not without reason, the reviews of the film "I Spit on Your Graves 3" are full of masakra level characteristics, noting the presence of a small fraction of CGI inherent in the style of Brownstein. Indeed, the scenes related to the guro meta-genre are delivered with special originality and sophistication, without limitations.

Plot

The third part originates where the first picture ends. "I spit on your graves 3" the plot is simple and predictable. According to the narrative, avoiding punishment for the committed violence against the rapists, the main character Jennifer (Sarah Butler) is trying to return to normal life. He changes his name, gets a job and begins to attend group therapy for victims of sexual violence. There, the heroine draws closer to a real tear, a female rocker Marla (Jennifer Landon). Marla insists that the perpetrators must be punished, inflicting no less pain on them. Reviews about the film "I spit on your graves 3" emphasize that at this moment all intrigue of the picture is lost, even ordinary viewers will not be difficult to guess about the further development of the plot. Indeed, even though Jennifer does not want to resort to violence again, but the emergence of new circumstances forces the girl to again feel a craving for him.

Acting Casting

The film "I Spit on Your Graves 3" (actors: S. Butler, D. Landon, D. McKien, G. Hogan, M. Hurd) is favorably distinguished by well-written character characters, which is not at all characteristic of modern horror films. Fans of the original film can not but rejoice to return to the role of Jennifer Hills combat beauty Sara Butler. Her lightness and speed with which the heroine again turns from a respectable girl into an artful and merciless hunter of rapists, amazes the viewer. Marla, a broken girl-rocker was played by Jennifer Landon - as they say, with a bang. Their interaction is a stunning explosive mixture, a real bomb. Of the performers of the roles of the second plan, Joshua Kovalchik, who played the role of detective, stands out. The other actors played less brightly, but conscientiously, without remaining mediocre scenery in horror.

Breaking the rules of the game

The film "I Spit on Your Graves 3" has earned many reviews. Some of the movie censors called the movie "torture porn", shot according to a simple formula. The basis of these films is the division of the story into two parts - at the beginning sadists sexually mock over the girl-victim who is not devoid of attraction, after the heroine takes revenge on the offenders, usually quite harshly. Indeed, in this picture, the presented scheme can be traced, perhaps the creators: producers, director, scriptwriter "I spit on your graves 3" - show the public that they do not sing about revenge and violence, but only warn against it, strongly condemning it. The two previous franchise films neatly and accurately, literally blindly followed this formula (like the cult eponymous film of 1980), but the creators of the third part change the rules of the game. Traditional for the previous films of mockery of the main character they left behind the scenes. In the first part of the tape, they presented the viewer with several victims of sexual violence (group therapy), and in the second part Jennifer, by the will of fate, appears as an angel of retribution, equipped with various piercing-cutting tools.

Dualism paintings

From the artistic point of view, the third film is the most solid and strong of the whole cycle. It's not the technical side of the picture, professional and naturalistic, but rather the certainty with which the creators built drama. Analyzing the plot structure of the picture "I spit on your graves 3", reviews of moviegoers indicate that the creators give a lot of arguments for the fact that never and under no circumstances can you humbly substitute the second cheek. However, at the same time, they emphasize the fact that violence is similar to drug addiction, penetrating a person, it burns the soul, destroys the person. But nonetheless, scriptwriter Daniel Gilboi again tries to convey to the viewer the old movie truth, which says that the good must also be with the kulaks.

For the sake of justice, it should be noted that such an author's message is realized in the film by no means deeper than in the same "Thirst for Death", and as a whole is not a revelation in the modern film industry. Given the remarkable acting work of Jennifer Landon, Sarah Butler, Joshua Kowalczyk and Doug McKeon, who embodied on the screen the father of a young girl who committed suicide after the attack, the film can claim the status of one of the best horror of its focus.

Accusations of feminism

A sufficiently large number of reviews of the audience reproach the picture in the presence of clearly expressed ideas of feminism. Users who wrote reviews in this vein state that now all feminists in the world can sleep peacefully, looking for blissful dreams of imminent reprisal against men. They call the new third part useless, senseless and unreasonably cruel. The narrative is called a story about the gradual madness of the main character, accusing the plot in the absence of a semantic load. Defining the film as a demonstration of bloody lynchings over rapists, categorically minded viewers suggest changing the slogan of the project to a more sonorous one: "Violence breeds violence." Supporters of this assessment of the activities of the director RD Braunstein say that he literally cuts off an impressive portion of a healthy audience from the very first minutes of the time-keeping. They explain that the further development of the storyline will be interesting only for real feminists, they will not mind watching the sadistic abuse of women over representatives of the strong half of humanity.

Original move

In addition to the author's tricks in the tape "I spit on your graves 3" reviews of the audience note the high-quality musical accompaniment. All the musical compositions sounding in the film are created by the Austrian composer Wendler Edwin. And their spectrum ranges from zhudrobitelnogo aggressive hard rock to melodic instrumental compositions. These musical inserts perfectly complement the key turns in the plot of the film, the change in the atmosphere of the narrative and the visual part from the operator of the picture of Richard J. Vialet. The operator of thoughtful plans managed to keep the viewer's attention around the main plot. This is truly a professional and innovative, innovative approach.

The result

Horror was not the worst in the franchise. Director RD Braunshtein withdrew his project in accordance with the fundamental postulates revenge movie (films about revenge), so you will not have to miss the viewer during the viewing. Of course, all kinds of jerks in the tape are present (where are they without them), and the filling is very controversial, but the film will certainly please its audience with a rethought and renewed view of the franchise and the already pretty jaded idea as a whole. And this is a definite plus. But given that all the scenes of violence are very cruel and rather nontrivial, you can recommend Braunstein's brainchild for viewing only to those who normally tolerate screen perverted cruelty, or simply "meat".