Morphological analysis of the sacrament

The system of preparation of pupils and students-philologists assumes studying of a course "Morphology". In practical classes on Russian language, in studying this course, much attention is paid to the morphological analysis of parts of speech.

It is especially useful to concentrate on the morphological analysis of the sacrament, because many people make mistakes in connection with the complexity of the theoretical material on the topic.

Carrying out the morphological analysis of the sacrament, it is necessary to remember the following:

1. Communion from the sentence should be written out with the word, on which it is dependent. Due to this, the number, genus and case are correctly determined. If a morphological analysis of a short participle is carried out , it should be written out together with the subject.

2. Communion must be distinguished from adjectives that have passed into participles. The analysis of such adjective names is as follows:

Abandoned (homestead) - an adjective, formed from the sacrament.

3. For the sacrament are two attributes, "borrowed" from the verb, are the form and time. Transitivity does not indicate.

4. Determining the type of participle, one must rely on the knowledge of suffixes, which are specific for each type of participle.

Actual participle in the present tense form the conjugation of the imperfect form of the present tense from the verb I of the present tense, using the suffixes -ush (-yusch), and also from the verb II of conjugation by means of suffixes -ax (-s): laughing, sitting.

The actual participle in the past tense is formed from the verb of the past tense, using suffixes -w (-s): stuck, broken.

A suffering participle in the present tense is formed from the verb of the imperfect form of the present tense by means of suffixes -om (-em) (for verbs I conjugation) and -im (for verbs II conjugation): readable, audible.

The past participle in the past is formed from the verb of the past tense by suffixes -nn, -enne (-one), -t. In complete passive participles is written -nn, in short-n: upset, thrown out, drunk.

5. For proper identification of participles, the semantic principle of their distinction is equally important:

A) it is possible to compare the participles with the verb: the luminous lantern is the one that shines; A flying plane is the one that flies;

B) sometimes you can ask a question that unites the semantic questions of the participle and the verb: what is doing? What did he do?

6. The inconsistent signs of participles coincide with the signs of the names of adjectives. The genus of participles in the plural is not specified.

Morphological analysis of the sacrament:

1. Name a part of the speech and indicate its general grammatical meaning.

2. List the morphological features:

- indicate the initial form (nominative, masculine, singular);

- name the constant signs (passive or real, kind, time);

- indicate non-permanent characteristics (short or full form, number, gender, case).

3. Specify the syntactic role of the sacrament in the sentence.

Morphological analysis of the sacrament in writing:

The brilliant bell tower of the severed church stood out against the sky.

Unwrapped (church)

1. Church (what?) Razvorochennoy - prich.

2. N.f. - Ripped. Post: strad., Pr. Vr., Perf. view. Nepost: full. F., One. Hours, wives. Genus.

3. Church (what?) Razvorochennoy.

Morphological analysis of the sacrament in oral form:

The unraveled (the church) is the communion.

First, it denotes the feature of the object by action (the church that has been razed), is formed from the verb to spread . The initial form is stripped.

Secondly, it has constant signs: passive, past tense, perfect appearance. The sentence is consistent with the word of the church and is used in its full form; The only number, the female gender are its non-permanent signs.

Thirdly, the sentence acts as a definition.