Biosocial creature, the creator of culture - who is this? Why is man a biosocial being?

Man is a biosocial creature, the creator of culture and its creation. But this characteristic is suitable for a person, whom a person is not at birth, but becomes due to his development. And yet the biosocial being, the creator of culture - who is it? How are these two concepts related?

Biological and social in human nature

Why is man a biosocial being? This term came from the merger of two principles: biological and social. The first directly relates to man, since he came out of nature, evolves and exists according to its laws, was and remains a part of it. The functioning of the human body is similar to that of the other living beings. He can not renounce nature: in order to survive as a separate element, he must eat and breathe, and in order to survive as a species, multiply and transmit his characteristics by inheritance. The latter is governed by the basic genetic law, to which not only man, but also all other animals are subject.

Biological is responsible for material, physical, development, but spiritual - the diocese of the social beginning. Without society, people will not learn to talk, express their thoughts and think at all. It is known that for the character of the future personality, education is more responsible than genes, in addition, in order to become it, one also has to work hard. Although social development is important in the life of higher vertebrates, only a single person has gone beyond the boundaries of biological evolution, which allows him to be called homo sapiens, that is, not just a "person" but a "reasonable person".

The problem of anthroposociogenesis

Anthroposociogenesis considers the origin and development of man. The sphere of his influence also includes the dialectic of the natural and social in his life. This is inherent in the term "anthroposociogenesis". It boils down to the fact that man is both an animal and not an animal. His direct relationship to the biological and social has already been detailed in the previous paragraph.

There are two approaches to this duality problem: subjective and objective. In the first case, a person is represented as his inner world, in the second - as a carrier of external conditions of existence. The synthesized approach is better suited to the very principle of dialectics, which shows that two sides of one essence can not go separately, only their intertwining means the beginning of something new and unknown before.

Synthesis for the definition of the concept of essence

It has already been considered that a person is a biosocial being. The creator of culture is a synonym for the one who manifested his essence, in which the two begin to unite. This phenomenon can occur under the influence of various factors. At the same time there is no objective idea about the very concept of essence. The atheist and religious approach connects her accordingly with reason and God.

The concept of creativity in culture

What is called creativity? This is the process of making non-standard decisions. The beginnings of creative abilities are in everyone, as everyone is able to develop new forms of activity in one way or another. But only what is believed to be genuine is what leads to the creation of a new one not only for the person who created it, but also for society as a whole. The problem of the culture of creativity boils down to the fact that it arises in the inner world, under the influence of the external, and returns to it, but in a different light. And this unprecedented form can be accepted by others if it corresponds to the aesthetics of perception, or not.

Dialectics of creativity

And creativity is dual. This is not only the creation of a new one, but also a readiness for it. External and internal factors affect the creativity of culture. Creation requires their correspondence with each other. Man is the creator of culture only when his inner perception and self-expression are adequately combined with the space in which he lives. Thus, dialectic becomes a link with his works. That is why one answer is given to the question "A biosocial being, the creator of culture - who is this?" It's a man.

Personality is not born, but become

The individual, individuality, personality - all these are different stages of spiritual development. Man is the creator of culture only when he is a social being capable of creating something new and useful to society. Personality is comprehensively and harmoniously developed, it manifests itself in actions for which it is ready to accept responsibility, and decisions that are ready to accept independently. One of its characteristics is an act. It should be noted that this is not just the commission of something, it is the result of free choice.

freedom of choice

The essence of freedom of choice lies in the fact that the internal attitudes, beliefs and moral principles of the individual regulate its actions. These principles are quite resistant to verification - they are unchanged under the influence of low-lying factors. At the same time, it is known that the ability to change your previously erroneous opinion is a property of the wise. But this is also due to freedom of choice, because you need to take the right view and renounce the wrong. Not everyone can do this.

The paradox of freedom of choice is that its availability implies imposition of limitations in the form of obligations and responsibilities. Even Nietzsche said that "spiritually gifted", then, real people, "find their happiness where others would have found their destruction," they are ascetics who know the true significance of self-coercion. Ultimately, one can know one's desires only through an understanding of one's needs.

Personality and culture

Man is the creator of culture and therefore is its driving force, and also the main goal of its formation. At the same time, thanks to the reproduction of culture, a person develops and progresses. This is an endless and amazing process: in order to create, a person must be sufficiently spiritually developed, and the product allows him to develop even more intensively and better. The same is observed when considering the very interrelation between culture and personality: one not only creates the second, but also is a part of it.

Culture can not be a single one - it is a whole spectrum of all creations, and regardless of whether the individual element or collective created it, it is always a product of the joint work of society. And this is also the merit of biosociality: the socium, personality and culture are continuously interconnected cogs of one system, through which homo sapiens as a species continue to exist and evolve in the spiritual plane.