Analysis of the fable "Frogs asking the king." A work that is worth reading to many contemporaries!

Analysis of the fable "Frogs begging the king" Allows to emphasize the negative perception of rulers and leaders in society. A work written more than 200 years ago, in certain cases, can be an example for some today.

From Aesop to Krylov

Since the times of ancient literature, the fable has occupied a special place. She managed to notice such traits of a human character that were always considered vicious and evoked negative feelings. The first who spoke of human failings with the language of the fable was the wisest Greek philosopher Aesop. The ability not to name a specific person, resorting to allegory, pointed to the shortcomings with which it is necessary to fight.

His follower was Lafontaine. "Frogs begging the king" is a fable belonging to his pen. Allegory allows authors to make the protagonists of representatives of the animal world. To understand how such a technique works, you need to analyze the fable "Frogs asking the king."

Content

So, what is this product about? Long ago, the inhabitants of the marshes wanted to be led by the king. Jupiter listened to their request and sent to their kingdom a huge aspen treehead. Frogs feared him, but then, bravely, began to behave disrespectfully, despite the high title of their new master.

Churban did not interfere with anything, he did not reproach his subjects in anything. But he did nothing useful for them. This caused discontent all around the king. The frogs wanted the master of the quick, and they again appealed to Jupiter.

The serpent ascended the throne. Agile and beautiful, she severely punished for disobedience. Even innocent frogs became her dinner. The survivors complained to the heavenly lord. Jupiter was surprised, but refused the next request of frogs, promising them to send as king the ruler even worse than before.

Caution Zeus

Not only Lafontaine wrote about the discontent with those who are in power, Krylov also turns to this topic, "Frogs begging the king" is a fable that is also found in his collection. Under the frogs of the famous fabulist people are meant. In Krylov, as before, the first dumb ruler becomes an aspen block, replaced by the Crane.

In order to make contrast in the process of government and more vividly describe the position of frogs, the authors of fables choose as a second kings a snake and a crane, because they both like to eat frogs. He was given a quiet and calm king, he was underestimated, he did not want a quiet and quiet life, she seemed too boring and uninteresting to frogs. And the other was even worse. It is not for nothing that they say: "They are not looking for good from the good". "Live with him, so that you will not be worse!" - Zeus warns frogs.

Conducted Analysis of the fable "Frogs begging the king" Will help to determine what is the moral in this fable. And it's simple: you can not change everything at once. It is necessary to take into account that everything in nature has its own development, but it is gradual. If the frogs were to suffer, they adapted to the chump and even learned to extract from communication with him a huge benefit. The essence of the fable of morality has not lost its relevance.

About the rhyme, the characters of the characters

The fable, written by Ivan Andreevich Krylov ("Frogs begging King "), in verse. The author has a very clear rhyme: sideways - face, side - back, power - glory.

The main flaw that prevails in society and marked by the author - A painful passion for change, a reluctance to accept the existing situation as it is, a desire to change its former way of life, not relying on the past and its experience. Frogs became "do not like the people's rule," "I did not like to live freely and freely."

The author's most memorable phrases are: "Cracked on the kingdom", "it seemed absolutely ignoble."

The main characters of the fable are frogs, they are in constant contact with Zeus and the changing kings. Because of the characteristic features of nature, you can name them:

• Cowardly;
• Obsequious to those who are much higher than their status.

But as soon as they feel impunity, they immediately demonstrate their disdain for the king, turning his back on him. Zeus is very attentive to all requests addressed to him.

• The king is a block of steppes, silent, of enormous growth.
• Crane of a different disposition, does not like to indulge and indulge anyone. He has two images. It's a bird eating frogs. Terrible king, who punishes his subjects indiscriminately.

For the author it seems to be a nonsense and incredible stupidity to change the will to oppressed life.

The nationality of the work

In the fable "Frogs asking the king" morality Can be replaced by well-known proverbs: "Better than a bird in your hand, than a crane in the sky", "horses do not roam from the stern," "they do not seek for good from the good".

Krylov always likes to show through laughter and mild joke, over which points it is worth pondering. And there are a lot of them in the fable.

As is known, people take bright expressions from famous works, which they actively use in their everyday speech, thereby making these expressions winged, aphoristic. These phrases adorn the speaker's vocabulary. In addition, colloquial speech brings the work closer to the people. Here are some examples: "to grieve to grieve," "swallows like flies," "do not stick your nose out," "why not?"

Krylov's views and their expression in the fables

In any case, the phrase said by Zeus at the very end of the work, makes an indelible impression. It sounds like this: "Live with him, so that you will not be worse!". Thus, the analysis of the fable "Frogs begging the king" allows us to say that this is a very sharp and sharp topic in which the author tried to maximally express his negative attitude towards the ruling imperial elite. The fabulist believed that good kings do not exist and every succeeding ruler will only get worse. Ivan Andreevich Krylov wrote a lot for his creative life: "Frog begging the Tsar", "Oboz" and others, in which he, without fear of punishment, boldly shows his attitude towards the Russian tsars.

Thus, the morality of the fable can be applied even now. No matter how good the leader is, the ruler - a person always expresses his dissatisfaction with his work and wants a new one. And it can turn out to be a lime block or crane.