A masterpiece is a work that has stood the test of time

If you believe the dictionaries, the masterpiece is an exceptional work of art or craftsmanship, which in time does not lose its artistic value and meaning. The masterpiece is unique and unique in its kind.

In the Middle Ages, the masterpieces were products made by apprentices, who dreamed of being called masters.

What canons define masterpieces of art?

When defining a masterpiece, it is very difficult to escape from the subjective attitude to the subject of art.

Everyone knows the expression "about tastes do not argue", thus, gives the scope for the perception of each person. But when we say the word "masterpiece", we put a stamp of the highest quality, claiming unequivocal admiration. Does this mean that a masterpiece is something that stands outside the usual criteria of the artistic value of a work of art?

Absolutely accurate and indisputable definition of a masterpiece is not a single author. How can you understand that this work relates to unique, eternal and unsurpassed?

Signs of the masterpiece

Obviously, a masterpiece is a work of art, showing signs of freshness and novelty with a simple (or simple enough) and understandable for most incarnations combined with a deep taste. As a rule, a masterpiece is determined by a large number of people who will call this work without special proofs and justifications.

The main thing is that the masterpiece always stands the test of time, producing the same impression on admirers as many centuries ago.

Are there small masterpieces?

In any country there are talented authors who create masterpieces by default. To such in Russia it is possible to carry, for example, the composer Mikael Tariverdiev. But his music, at the same time, is known and appreciated only in the CIS countries, and works that were performed abroad are not masterpieces.

Does this mean that recognizing a work as a masterpiece requires a correction for the mentality, cultural traditions and heritage of the country in which it was created? Can there be a small town, a small masterpiece? This is a very controversial and still insoluble issue. After all, Russian folk tales are also a masterpiece of folk art, but, nevertheless, they are precisely for the Russian-speaking population of the Earth.

A masterpiece is a product of a delicate combination of logic and emotions

A work claiming the title of a masterpiece, as a rule, is a harmonious combination of mathematical logic that does not interfere with "symmetry", and the emotions that the author puts in it.

Equally important is the experience and personal achievements of the creator. The famous Velázquez, who created masterpieces of painting, spoke about his works: "I wrote the picture for two hours and ... the entire previous life." And Leonardo da Vinci, for example, was very unhappy with his unique "Mona Lisa", considering it unfinished.

In the perception of the work, as a rule, the emotional background plays a huge role. "I cried before these works, not with sadness, but with overwhelming delight", - said the connoisseur about the works of the Italian masters of painting, located in the Louvre. Obviously, a masterpiece is a master's work that can evoke such emotions.