Versions of the origin of man. Basic theories of human origin

To date, there are different versions of the origin of man on Earth. This scientific theory, and alternative, and apocalyptic. Many people consider themselves descendants of angels or divine forces, despite the convincing evidence of scientists and archaeologists. Authoritative historians deny this theory as mythology, giving preference to other versions.

General concepts

For a long time man has been the subject of studying the sciences of the spirit and nature. Between sociology and natural science there is still a dialogue about the problem of being and the exchange of information. At the moment, scientists have given the person a specific definition. It is a biosocial being that combines intellect and instincts. It should be noted that not one person in the world is such a creature. Such a definition can be attributed to a stretch to some representatives of the fauna on Earth.

Modern science clearly shares biology and the essence of man. The search for a boundary between these components is carried out by leading research institutes around the world. This field of science was called sociobiology. She looks deep into the essence of a person, revealing his natural and humanitarian characteristics and preferences. A holistic view of society is impossible without attracting the data of his social philosophy. Today, a person is a being that has an interdisciplinary character. However, many people around the world are concerned about another issue - its origin. Scientists and religious scholars of the planet have been trying to answer it for thousands of years.

The Origin of Man: Introduction

The question of the appearance of an intelligent life beyond the Earth attracts the attention of leading scientists of various specialties. Some people agree that the origin of man and society is not worthy of study. Basically, those who sincerely believe in supernatural forces think so. Based on this view of the origin of man, the individual was created by God. This version has been refuted by scientists for decades.

Regardless of which category of citizens each person relates to, in any case, this issue will always be exciting and intriguing. Recently, modern philosophers began to ask themselves and others: "Why were people created, and what is their purpose of being on Earth?". The answer to the second question will never be found.

As for the appearance of a sensible creation on the planet, it is quite possible to investigate this process. Today, the basic theories of human origin try to answer this question, but none of them can provide a 100 percent guarantee of correctness of their judgments. At present, scientists-archeologists and astrologers around the world are exploring all possible sources of life on the planet, whether they are chemical, biological or morphological.

Unfortunately, at the moment, humanity has not even been able to determine in which century the first people appeared .

Theory of Darwin

Now there are different versions of the origin of man. However, the most probable and close to the truth is the theory of a British scientist named Charles Darwin. It was he who made an invaluable contribution to biological science. His theory is based on the definition of natural selection, which plays the role of the driving force of evolution. This is a natural-scientific version of the origin of man and all life on the planet. The foundations of Darwin's theory formed his observations of nature while traveling around the world. Development of the project was started in 1837, and lasted more than 20 years. In the late 19th century, the Englishman was supported by another natural scientist, A. Wallace. Shortly after his report in London, he confessed that it was Charles who was his inspiration. So there was a whole direction - Darwinism.

The followers of this movement agree that all types of representatives of fauna and flora on the Earth are variable and come from other, pre-existing species. Thus, the theory is based on the volatility of all living things in nature. The reason for this is natural selection. On the planet only the strongest forms survive, which are capable of adapting to the current environmental conditions. Man is just such a being. Thanks to the evolution and the desire to survive, people began to develop their skills and knowledge.

Theory of intervention

At the heart of this version of the origin of man is the activity of extraneous civilizations. It is believed that people are descendants of alien creatures that landed on Earth millions of years ago. Such a history of the origin of man has several junctions.

According to some, people appeared as a result of crossing aliens with ancestors. Others believe that the whole fault is the genetic engineering of higher forms of intelligence, which led homo sapiens out of the flask and their own DNA. Someone is sure that people have occurred as a result of the error of experiments on animals. On the other hand, a very interesting and probable version is the version of the alien intervention in the evolutionary development of homo sapiens. It's no secret that archaeologists still find in the various corners of the world numerous drawings, records and other evidence that ancient people were helped by some kind of supernatural forces. This applies to the Mayans, who allegedly enlightened extraterrestrial creatures with wings on strange heavenly chariots.

There is also a theory that the whole life of mankind from origin to the peak of evolution proceeds according to a long-established program, laid down by alien intellect. There are also alternative versions of the relocation of earthlings from the planets of such systems and constellations as Sirius, Scorpio, Libra, etc.

Evolutionary theory

The followers of this version believe that the appearance of a person on Earth is associated with a modification of primates. This theory is by far the most widespread and discussed. Proceeding from it, people have descended from some kinds of monkeys. Evolution began in times immemorial under the influence of natural selection and other external factors.

The theory of evolution does have a number of interesting evidence and evidence, both archaeological, paleontological, genetic, and psychological. On the other hand, each of these statements can be interpreted in different ways. Ambiguity of the facts - that's what does not make this version 100% correct.

Theory of Creation

This branch received the name of creationism. His followers deny all the basic theories of the origin of man. It is believed that God created people, which is the highest link in the world. Man was created in his likeness from non-biological material. The biblical version of the theory says that the first people were Adam and Eve. Their God created their clay. In Egypt and many other countries, religion goes far into ancient myths. The overwhelming majority of skeptics consider this theory to be impossible, estimating its probability in billions of a percent.

The version of the creation of all living things by God does not require proof; it simply exists and has the right to do so. In its support, we can give similar examples from the legends and myths of peoples of different corners of the Earth. These parallels can not be left without attention.

Theory of anomalies in space

This is one of the most controversial and fantastic versions of anthropogenesis. The followers of the theory consider the appearance of man on Earth as an accident. In their opinion, people have become the product of anomalies of parallel spaces. The forefathers of earthlings were representatives of the civilization of humanoids, which are a mixture of Matter, Aura and Energy.

The theory of anomalies suggests that in the universe millions of planets with similar biospheres, which were created by a single information substance. Under favorable conditions, this leads to the emergence of life, that is, the humanoid mind.

Otherwise, this theory is largely similar to the evolutionary one, with the exception of the statement about a certain program for the development of mankind.

Aquatic theory

This version of the origin of man on Earth is almost 100 years old. In the 1920s, the aquatic theory was first proposed by a renowned marine biologist named Alistair Hardy, who was subsequently supported by another authoritative scientist, the German Max Westenhoffer. The version is based on the dominant factor that caused the anthropoid apes to reach a new stage of development. This is what compelled the monkeys to change the water way of life on land. So the hypothesis explains the absence of thick hair on the body. Thus, at the first stage of evolution, a person moved from the stage of the hydrotherapy, which appeared more than 12 million years ago, to homo erectus, and then to sapiens.

Today this version in science is practically not considered.

Alternative theories

One of the most fabulous versions of the origin of man on the planet is that descendants of people were certain bats. In some religions they are called angels. It is these creatures that have been inhabiting the entire earth since time immemorial. Their appearance was similar to a harpy (a mixture of bird and man). The existence of such creatures is supported by numerous rock carvings.

There is also another theory, according to which people in the early stages of development were real giants. According to some legends, such a giant was a half-human demigod, since one of their parents was an angel. Over time, the higher forces ceased to descend to Earth, and the giants disappeared.

Ancient myths

On the origin of man there is a huge number of legends and legends. In ancient Greece believed that the progenitors of the people were Deucalion and Pyrrhus, who by the will of the gods experienced a flood and created a new race of stone statues.

The ancient Chinese believed that the first man was formless and left the clay coma. The creator of people is the goddess Nyuva. She was a man and a dragon in one person.

According to the Turkish legend, people left the Black Mountain. In her cave was a pit, which resembled the shape of a human body. The streams of rain washed the clay into it. When the form was filled and warmed by the sun, the first person emerged from it. His name is Ai-Atam.

Myths about the origin of a man of Sioux Indians say that the Rabbit-universe created humans. The divine creature found a clot of blood and began to play with it. Soon he began to roll on the ground and turned into guts. Then a heart and other organs appeared on the blood clot. As a result, the rabbit rolled a full-fledged boy - the Sioux ancestor.

According to ancient Mexicans, God created the face of a man from pottery clay. But because he overcame the workpiece in the oven, the person turned out burned, that is, black. The subsequent attempts were getting better all over again, and people were getting out whiter.

Mongolian tradition is one to one similar to Turkish. Man emerged from the clay form. The only difference is that the pit itself was dug by the pit.

Stages of evolution

Despite the versions of the origin of man, all scientists agree that the stages of its development were identical. The first upright prototypes of people were Australopithecus, who communicated with each other with the help of hands and were no higher than 130 cm.

The next stage of evolution produced the Pithecanthropus. These creatures already knew how to use fire and adjust the nature to their own needs (stones, skin, bones). Further, the evolution of man reached the paleanthropic period. At this time, the prototypes of people could already communicate with sounds, think collectively.

The last stage of evolution before the emergence of a reasonable man became neanthropines. Outwardly, they hardly differed from modern people. They made tools, joined tribes, elected leaders, held polls, rituals.

Ancestral humanity

Despite the fact that scientists and historians all over the world are still arguing about theories of the origin of people, the exact place where the mind was born has yet to be established. This is an African continent. Many archaeologists believe that it is possible to narrow the location to the northeastern part of the continent, although there is an opinion about the domination of the southern half in this matter. On the other hand, there are people who believe that mankind has appeared in Asia (on the territory of India and the surrounding countries).

The conclusions that the first people inhabited Africa were made after numerous discoveries as a result of large-scale excavations. It is noted that at that time there were several types of the prototype of man (races) at once.

The strangest archaeological findings

Among the most interesting artifacts that can affect the idea of what actually was the origin and development of man, skulls of ancient people with horns got. Archaeological research was conducted in the Gobi desert by a Belgian expedition in the mid-20th century. On the territory of the former Sumerian civilization , images of flying people and objects that were heading to Earth from beyond the solar system were repeatedly found. Similar drawings are also found in several ancient tribes.

In 1927, as a result of excavations, a strange transparent skull was found in the Caribbean Sea, similar to a crystal skull. Numerous studies have not revealed the technology and material of manufacture. The descendants of the Maya tribe claim that their ancestors worshiped this skull, like a supreme deity.