What unites the concept of "duty" and "duty"? Are there any differences between them?

For sure, every person has heard such words: "You must!" Or "You must!" And often they sound in the same context. But, all the same, what unites the notion of "duty" and "duty"?

Terminology

So, start with a word that has a broader definition. And this is a duty. The obligation, in other words, money, which is transferred to the borrower by its creditor with the condition of further return together with the reward (that is, with interest).

It is customary to distinguish several types of debt - national, state (external and internal), municipal, corporate, personal, public and moral.

What is duty? In fact, a synonym for debt. This word means actions that are unconditional for execution. There are also other synonyms - necessity and duty. So the use of both these words in the same context can be considered correct and permissible.

Turning to the Constitution

In this document, the concepts of "duty" and "duty" stand side by side, in the first part of Article 59, to be more precise. It says that the defense of the Fatherland is a duty and duty of a citizen of the Russian Federation. Why is that? Well, the history of such a formulation is rooted in the socialist past.

Then the Motherland (that is, the Fatherland) cared for its people. Free education, medical care, places in kindergartens and even real estate housing were provided. Pensioners were paid pensions and paid their benefits. Homeland to each and every one guaranteed the integrity and reliability of bank deposits. The risk of inflation was minimal.

And for all this people gave the so-called duty to the Motherland, which, incidentally, was also a plus for people. For example, the service in the Armed Forces of the USSR is the real defense of the Fatherland, a duty and a duty. But it was very honorable.

The moral side of the question

It is worth mentioning the topic, which touches upon such concepts as moral duty and duties. The fact is that this is a special category of ethics that determines the attitude of a person to society and to other people. Debt is a moral task that a person sets for himself, focusing on personal principles and promises to oneself. Such a duty can be parental, sonny, comradely, fraternal, friendly, etc.

People often make promises about their work. By all means help the needy, for example. Or cure the patient, however neglected his case may be. Find a criminal even if he is the most dangerous. Such a debt can be social, military, patriotic, medical, judicial, investigative.

All of the above refers to the moral requirements, acting as a duty of the person, assigned to him by the shoulders themselves.

Conscience

The above was quite clearly told about what unites the concepts of "duty" and "duty". In fact, when a person makes such moral demands to himself, it characterizes him on the best side, speaks about the presence of his conscience, which is a reflection of consciousness and a sense of moral responsibility for human behavior. It is often called our "internal regulator", which helps us to perform certain actions and behave in a certain way.

This is the very "determinant", which always, with the help of an inner voice, tells us what is good and what is bad, and helps to do the right thing.

Shame

What unites the notions of "duty" and "duty"? One more word. And this is shame. There is a vivid example.

Let's say a person has made a promise to help his parents, by all means, at all costs. Once he had a hard time - literally, spending the night at work, round the clock work, compiling reports and all the fuss. And then, finally, he gets home, and all he needs is a bath, food and sleep.

But suddenly his parents call and ask for help. Let's say, pick up building materials from the store, because they bought something heavy, and the taxi can not be reached. What does a person do? With great difficulty, overcoming wild fatigue, he goes to help them.

Having spent time and the rest of his strength, he returns, but he feels, in a surprisingly good mood. He fulfilled his moral duty, did not let his relatives down, and kept his promise, once given in front of him, and he is good at heart. But if he refused? There would be a sediment. He would have felt shame, because the subconscious without his participation "would have weighed" his deed in accordance with his conscience. "But I promised", - only he will sigh.

Are there any differences?

So, what unites the notions of "duty" and "duty" is understandable. Are there differences? It is believed that yes. And there is also an explanation for this statement.

It is believed that debt is closely related to justice. Often this judgment is even defined as an explanation of the concept itself. "Debt is the restoration of balance in the relationship between several people," - so it sounds. That is, in fact, only the person who held (not necessarily money) can be due.

Adherents of this opinion argue that the word "duty" should not be taken as a synonym for this notion, since this, in turn, is a formal agreement to perform certain actions under specific conditions. However, in certain cases, concepts really need to be distinguished. Some people with a lack of conscience often manipulate others, using phrases like "You must!" And "You must!".

However, one will be difficult to challenge: both one and the second concept has a direct relation to morality. And this is a fact.