What is better - a colonoscopy or an irrigoscopy of the intestine? Reviews

At present, when innovations please us with the most modern technologies in any industry, high-quality equipment will help to check the work of all organs of the human body and identify failures. You can detect diseases in the colon in several ways. With their help it is possible to detect the presence of fistulas, tumors, malformations, to carry out diagnostics, to track changes in the course of this or that disease. To find out what is better - a colonoscopy or an irrigoscopy, it is necessary to understand in details the intricacies of one and another examination. But the choice in choosing depends on the characteristics of the body and the symptoms of the disease.

Colonoscopy, its features

The main advantage of colonoscopy is that most patients who undergo this procedure can study the condition of the entire colon. In the process of research, you can make a biopsy of those areas where there is any suspicion of the disease, and immediately you can remove the polyps. If suddenly there is even the slightest suspicion of the presence of tumors in the large intestine, determining what is best - a colonoscopy or an irrigoscopy - depends only on the competence of the doctor.

In certain cases, it is best to start the study with the irrigoscopy, and in the future, if the suspicion of the tumor has been confirmed and you need to take the material for histology, you can apply a colonoscopy. It is this method that is considered to be the most accurate and in demand for those severe cases when all previously used survey methods proved ineffective. But in those "blind" zones, in the folds of the intestine and bends, the colonoscopy is not effective.

These two studies of the intestine have different capabilities and goals, and therefore give a specific answer to the question that it is better - colonoscopy or irrigoscopy, not. Both procedures provide an opportunity to identify the disease in time and prevent a fatal outcome.

The complexity of determining a cancerous growth in the large intestine is the unsystematic growth of the tumor, which can be determined already in the last stages. Colonoscopy makes it possible to detect the inflammatory process in any part of the intestine and it is easy, without consequences, to relieve the patient of adenomatous polyps. This procedure is often performed only under anesthesia, as it is very painful and unpleasant.

Irrigoscopy: its characteristics

The main advantage of irrigoscopy is the ability to identify segments of the intestines in which there is a narrowing, indicate how it is located in the abdominal cavity, and measure its size. This method of diagnosis is that the intestine is filled with barium contrast, after which the photograph is taken of the part that is followed using X-rays. The resulting image will perfectly show the anatomy of the intestine and large enough neoplasms in it, but you will not see inflammatory processes and the presence of polyps on it.

To this method of research resorted to if there is a suspicion of narrowing the intestine, or the person does not tolerate colonoscopy. This diagnosis is considered sparing and does not cause complications.

What are the differences between colonoscopy and irrigoscopy?

These two types of research reveal disruptions in the work of the intestine, pathologies throughout the colon. Irrigoscopy or a colonoscopy of difference still have, and they consist in the method of conducting diagnostics.

Irrigoscopy is an X-ray study, and colonoscopy is an endoscopic diagnosis.

During the irrigoscopy, the doctor takes pictures of the large intestine, before filling the entire cavity with barium sulfate. This solution fills the intestines and allows the X-ray to better examine the intestinal pathology. If you do not use it and take a picture, you will not see anything on it. Only by pictures doctor can diagnose.

During the colonoscopy, the diagnostician inserts a flexible tube into the colon of the patient and examines with it the entire internal surface of the intestine, thereby fixing the affected area of the intestine. This method of diagnosis allows not only to conduct a survey, but also provides an opportunity to conduct medical manipulations:

• Removal of polyps;
• Stop internal bleeding in the intestine;
• Restoration of normal lumen in the gut in the narrowing region.

In addition, during this study, the doctor can take samples for histology and monitor the correctness of treatment. But to accurately answer, which is better - an irrigoscopy or a colonoscopy, it is rather inconvenient. Each of these techniques is good in its field and helps in solving many problems.

What to choose?

Irrigoscopy or colonoscopy - which is better? If we compare these two methods of diagnosing, then the main thing that should be paid attention is the absence of a 100% guarantee on the accuracy of the data obtained. Neither one nor the second method will be able to determine all the intestinal pathologies effectively. But all the same doctors give priority to colonoscopy.

Only it can give reliable information about the internal state of the intestine and allows even to get samples for further research, and in some patients even help to remove polyps. But the exact diagnosis will not help to put either a colonoscopy or an irrigoscopy.

Positive and negative aspects of intestinal research

Diseases associated with the intestine, significantly affect the quality of life. When choosing the method of diagnosis, you should not postpone the study, and you should choose only a high-quality examination.

Colonoscopy can be compared with tomography, and it provides more opportunities for in-depth examination and detection of a large number of pathologies. She also helps to take samples for a biopsy and helps with treatment. This method is considered the most difficult, after which the patient for some time gets the impression that his stomach is swollen, but after a short time all the symptoms disappear.

Irrigoscopy also has its advantages - this procedure is not so painful, and the degree of injury from it is minimal. This method is well suited in cases where it is difficult to verify certain areas of the intestine in another way - bends and pockets.

And the main disadvantages of the diagnosis are contraindications to its conduct:

• Intussusception of the intestine;
• Pronounced form of diverticulosis.

In those cases, if there is a suspicion of obstruction in the intestine, then irrigoscopy is carried out using water-soluble substances, and this greatly affects the quality of the pictures.

Getting ready for an irrigoscopy

Colonoscopy or irrigonoskopiya intestines require a preliminary preparation of the body. Proper preparation of the intestine for the procedure will significantly increase the chances of the accuracy of the results.

Before going to the irrigoscopy, the patient must follow the diet and cleanse the intestines. All foods that can cause bloating, should be excluded from the diet for several days. You can not eat:

1. Fresh vegetables and fruits.
2. Perlovka.
3. Wheat and oat groats.
4. Exclude all kinds of greens and black bread.

It is best to sit on a steam diet for a few days - dishes cooked only on a steam bath. Before the procedure in the evening before and in the morning not to eat.

With regard to purification procedures, the exact results of irrigoscopy can be obtained with a clean intestine, so the patient must take a laxative and make an enema.

Are there complications after an irrigoscopy?

If the procedure was carried out correctly, then the irrigoscopy or colonoscopy of the intestine should not give complications. But with the administration of the drug barium sulfate in humans, there may be discomfort in the intestine and pain. After the procedure, the patient may have stool lag due to the drug, but taking laxatives and enema will help in solving this problem.

Getting ready for a colonoscopy

Irrigoscopy or colonoscopy, which is better? Each of these diagnostics is good in its own way and one must be well prepared for each of them, only in this case it is possible to obtain more accurate research data.

Preparation is necessary in order to cleanse the intestine for an accurate examination of all its sites and the detection of narrowing. In the intestine there should be no feces, gases, blood and mucus, only in this case it is possible without any problems to examine every centimeter of intestines. This is a general condition that is voiced in any diagnostic center or hospital, wherever there is a medical institution, public or private.

For example, an irrigoscopy or a colonoscopy in St. Petersburg for CHI is carried out only after a three-day diet. Before the colonoscopy, the patient can take in food:

• Low-fat broth and only on the second water;
• Beef, chicken meat in boiled form, including fish;
• Cottage cheese and yogurt;
• Unhealthy cookies and white bread.

From all other products, including fresh vegetables and fruits, it is better to completely give up. Such a strict diet still did not harm anyone, but it allowed to conduct research of the intestine with maximum accuracy.

Before going to the colonoscopy, the patient should not have supper and do not have breakfast, you can drink water or tea, take a laxative and make a cleansing enema.

There are also medicines that will help prepare the colon for colonoscopy:

1. Fortrans.
2. "Dufalac".
3. "Lavakol".

All these are laxatives, and they will help cleanse the intestines easily and without further discomfort.

Complications after a colonoscopy can be?

The most serious complication after a colonoscopy may be a bleeding or perforation of the bowel, but there are very few such cases. After the examination, a person may feel unpleasant sensations in the intestinal region, but he needs to lie down for a while, preferably on his stomach, and all the unpleasant sensations will go away.

Patient feedback on diagnosis

If it concerns the study of the intestine, then the question arises: irrigoscopy or colonoscopy - which is more informative? It is difficult to give an exact answer. It depends on many factors: the patient's condition, the disease. To say exactly what is best - colonoscopy or irrigoscopy of the intestine, is impossible, since each person has his own body and his symptoms. If one patient has been able to identify the disease using one method, then the other can not help much. For each, a certain method of diagnosis is effective: colonoscopy or irrigoscopy. The patients' responses vary. Someone notes the pain, someone, on the contrary, the simplicity of the procedure. Most patients respond positively to both methods. The main thing, as we have already said, is to prepare correctly for one and the other procedure in order to get the most accurate answers to all questions concerning the work of the intestine.