Proposals with gerundive turnover in Russian

In the glorious and mighty Russian language there are two special unconjugate forms of the verb, one of which we know as the gerund. It is an independent part of the speech of the Russian language, which serves to designate an additional action in the main. The gentile combines the grammatical properties of both adverbs and verbs and answers questions such as "what are you doing?", "What did you do?" . For example: lowering his eyes, flashing his dagger, loving nature, smiling thoughtfully, trying to do his homework and so on. Most often, the role of circumstance.

The construction of the verbal participle with dependent words in the sentence is called a participial turn. It means additional actions that are committed by the same active object, person or phenomenon as the main actions. It should always be separated by commas on both sides. For example: Flowers, having closed colored petals, fell asleep. Having closed the colored petals, the flowers fell asleep. The flowers fell asleep, closing the colored petals.

Proposals with gerundive turnover are most often used in written speech, rather than orally. They are also used in single-component, definite-personal sentences, for example, with verbs in the form of an imperative mood. However, it is possible to use an infinitive sentence with an infinitive sentence with an infinitive. Examples: The sun was setting, pouring everything around in red. He listened attentively, smiling from time to time.

It should be remembered that the proposal with gerundive turnover can not be used in the event that:

1. An impersonal sentence does not have an infinitive to which the turn should be attributed, but there is a set of the verb-a predicate with a noun or pronoun as a complement.

2. A verbal participle refers to passive participles, since in this case the subject of action, expressed with the help of the predicate, and the subject of the action, expressed with the help of a separate verbal participle, do not coincide.

3. If the verb-predicate has the form of the future tense.

In addition, do not forget about the stylistics of the proposal with gerundive turnover, namely:

• Such turns are shorter and more dynamic than similar forms of circumstantial contract proposals.
• It is impossible to express the meaning of time, cause, condition by a participial turn, therefore, if it is necessary to preserve the semantic hue of one of the types of contract proposals, it can not be replaced by a gypsy part;

• It is not recommended to start a paragraph or sentence for them, as this increases its volume and gives a dry, stencilled, clerical value to the entire text;
• Because there is a semantic proximity of the gypsy phrases to the contract proposals, that is, the possibility of their mutual replacement - this should be remembered. For example: Having worked well in May, you can relax a little in June. After we have worked well in May, in June it will be possible to have a little rest.
• Avoid parallel use of synonymous structures, because It contributes to the variety of speech, it helps to avoid monotony. For these purposes, the proposals with a gerundive turnover are perfectly suitable.