"Micromax Q380" phone: customer reviews

Budget smartphone "Micromax Q380" fans of mobile devices met quite ambiguously. It is clear that the model belongs to the budget segment and does not pretend to much, but its qualities that satisfy some users cause a negative for others. Let's try to understand the responses of the owners: what exactly they liked and did not like them in this gadget.

Design

Very attractive appearance turned out in the "Micromax Q380", the reviews confirm this. The coating is nice to the touch and does not slip, so do not constantly worry that the gadget will fall out of hand. It was noted that the paint from the frame, imitating the metal frame, eventually peels off, in this regard, the aesthetic side of the "Micromax Q380" suffers.

The battery can not be replaced, and this aspect caused both negative and approving reactions of the public. The fact that the old battery will not be able to replace it with a new one makes many indignant. Other users, on the contrary, believe that thus the developers managed to achieve a smaller thickness, because of which the gadget has become more convenient to use.

Although the battery is mounted, the back cover is still disconnected, since there are connectors for all kinds of cards inside. The presence of two SIM cards is always a plus, especially when they have separate connectors from the memory cards, which allows simultaneously working with two SIM cards simultaneously and increasing the memory for data storage with a USB flash drive.

Opinions about the screen

The bright and attractive display "Micromax Q380" with good viewing angles caused a storm of positive emotions among the owners of the device. The information is perfectly clear even on a bright sunny day, and viewing the image from different angles does not cause any problems. Owners are satisfied with the bright palette of colors, thanks to which you can see pictures or photos on the device - it's a pleasure.

All negative reviews related to the display are directed mainly towards low resolution, which does not reach 720 r, while the competitors of the device from the same budget category are able to please their owners with an HD-image. This disadvantage is the most significant in all "Micromax Q380". Reviews say that in a static position the picture looks attractive and clear, but in the process of playing games or watching videos on the screen, the pixels begin to appear, the video smears and loses its appeal, which makes it quite uninteresting to watch movies on the smartphone or use it as a game Console.

Contradictory opinions about "iron"

Although the phone "Micromax Q380" and acquired an advanced platform, many criticize it, as well as the technical component of the device as a whole. There are frequent hangs, glitches and a long wait at boot: for some users, applications opened for 5 seconds. Reboot for a while corrected the situation, but then the problem arose again - the smartphone eventually went to the service for repairs.

As for the processor, the reviews are divided: one four cores are enough to solve their problems, while others believe that the phone must work with a more resource-intensive software, and such an architecture is not enough. Owners complain that 1 GB of RAM is too little RAM. It is believed that it is the shortage of RAM that causes the system to work incorrectly and failures while using multitasking in "Micromax Q380". Reviews of other consumers and at all refer to the fact that the smartphone belongs to the budget category, and expect from it some miracles in terms of productivity is not worth it.

It is worth noting that the owners' opinions turned out to be so controversial because of the different degree of evaluation of the device. Those who are satisfied with the filling of the model, apparently, do not need complex applications and advanced games, and for simple software and the Internet, there is enough quad-core processor. Critics have been waiting on the gadget for greater productivity with the ability to run resource-intensive programs and games. For their requests, you need a smartphone from a more advanced segment.

As for the long downloads and disruptions in the system, this problem can be called objective, since almost all of them complained to varying degrees of phone hang-up, long file opening and other problems with the operation.

Smartphone "Micromax Q380": reviews of cameras

The main camera was recognized as one of the most significant advantages of a smartphone. 8 megapixel with autofocus copes with their work perfectly, allowing to obtain pictures of very decent quality for a phone of this segment. Excellent macro works, because of which the image stabilizer easily switches between distant and near objects. Also worth noting the clarity of photographs of text documents: letters and numbers are perfectly read in the pictures, there is no blurring. Of course, all this applies to shooting in good light or daylight. Somewhat worse, optics behave at night and with a deficit of light.

Front-camera

The camera-camera has only 2 megapixels, so it can not be called qualitative. But the owners are satisfied with the fact that it is present, and this is not a simple 0.3 Mp optic, installed for a tick, but a full-fledged camera that allows you to make a self-image if necessary and use it, for example, as an avatar in social networks.

Camcorder

Not bad was adopted and a video camera, which allows you to receive videos with a resolution of 720 r. Users are somewhat embarrassed that optics only shoots at a rate of 15 frames / s, not 30, but still the video looks good. The image a little slows down, but for viewing on small screens it will do.

Sound

With sound and conversational speakers, no one had any problems: high-quality and loud sound is noted above the average level. Troubles begin with the use of a headset. The set includes vacuum headphones, but users note that they are of very poor quality and you will need to purchase a more advanced headset to listen to music. But even expensive headphones do not allow to really enjoy the music player in "Micromax Q380": the reviews mention a quiet sound, unacceptable quality and almost complete absence of basses. There are some playback settings, but they do not change much of the picture. In this aspect, the device failed.

Battery

Many praise the autonomous operation of the device, arguing that even with the active use of the gadget charge is enough for a long enough period of time. Other owners of 2000 mAh are not enough, so they complain about low battery levels, and if you consider that you can not change it, the battery is instantly recorded in the minus.

A large percentage of buyers claim that the device is charging for a very long time: for some it takes about 3 hours. Also, there were cases when the gadget did not react at all to the charger, and it had to be included in the service.

Conclusion

So, having examined the phone "Micromax Q380", customer feedback and its cost of about 5 390-6 990 rubles, you can understand that on most device parameters the opinions of users are ambiguous. Some understand: the device is budget and you should not expect much from it, so the screen, battery and technical characteristics are well worth their money. Others want too much from a gadget of this kind. Naturally, in such a smartphone it's not so easy to shove an acceptable camera, a good processor and a lot of memory at the same time. To please users, for example, a decent quality camera, which is not a shame to take pictures, developers will have to neglect something else, say, the same audio player. There are, however, some unequivocal merits and demerits, but for the most part everyone has a subjective opinion.

Explicit pluses and minuses

The phone "Micromax Q380" reviews has though different, but still has objective merits and demerits.

Pros - IPS-matrix and screen brightness, the main camera with a large set of functions, HD-video, compact size, attractive design, good assembly, loud speaker.

Disadvantages - low screen resolution, long charging battery, instability of the system, hang-up, long file opening, weak multitouch, designed for only two touches.

For all other parameters, opinions were divided approximately equally, so here everyone must decide for himself. Perhaps lower the price of the device at least 1000 rubles or simply add a high resolution, the smartphone received from users a more cordial reception.