Marginal - is he who lives in the future?

In our society, the negative meaning of the word "marginal" was fixed. Perhaps this is due to a direct translation from Latin: "located at the edge, on the border." He gave the word a shade of something declassed, almost childless. The marginal is someone who is not on the side, not adjoining either to the future, or to those who want to stop time.

That is, such a person falls out of the main at the moment, stereotyped Perception of everything that happens in cultural or social life.

This definition can be approached as well as completely uneducated, downed people living primitive desires, and those whose creations and statements in many years will become something like the Bible. Because at the moment they are just them. And they do not have a generally accepted position in relation to the world around. Marginals are too strange, incomprehensible. They do not fit into the framework, and this frightens, makes you cautious about such an individual.

Arguing about who such a marginal person is, you understand that he can not have a clearly expressed positive or negative color. After all, along with homeless people, drug addicts and "gopnik", who could not adapt in society and rejected rules, among the marginals could be such as Leonardo da Vinci, Einstein or Count Tolstoy. They were also "people in themselves", those who lived by their own rules.

Hence, the marginal is someone who falls out of the usual, generally accepted, understandable. This is a state of "borderline", an intermediate between the understandable and the great, the one that will shine in the future, or between the understandable and the unfit, the indecent, that which will disappear along with the death of its carrier.

The most amazing in the concept, the marginal is the unpredictability of the further development of events for any person who does not fit into the everyday life of his contemporaries. After all, carriers of this attitude toward the world initially do not keep up. So, no one and nothing can affect their future fate. Time itself decides what to live, and what should go into oblivion.

After all, even those who proclaim themselves as oppositionists continue to think in accordance with generally accepted criteria, obeying the norms of behavior, language, thinking, and finally. For a marginal there can not be, by definition, criteria by which we could assess his legacy. After all, he is beyond time and situation. Therefore, it is very easy to accept someone's charlatanry for innovation, and consider "a man from the future" to be a madman.

This is the tragedy of the situation. It is very difficult for true prophets to call, and it is easy for false prophets to give wrong, false guidelines. No, there are no clear criteria in both art and culture to determine the truth of a phenomenon.

Marginal is someone who accumulates, develops features of thinking, principles that will be adopted in the next generations. He - a kind of yeast, which will rise a new image of humanity. What is now considered non-systemic, tomorrow can become the dominant opinion and the norm of perception. But it may not be!

So, talking about who is a person who has left some ideas about the world and, in the opinion of his contemporaries, who has not joined others, we will understand that this is a marginalized one. The meaning of the word itself suggests that this is a rather complex and indefinable phenomenon that only our descendants can rightly assess.