Ignorant and ignorant: the difference between them, examples from movies and literature

People are interested in the question: "The fool and the ignoramus - what is the difference between them, and is it there?". Let's analyze today on accessible examples and with the use of cinematographic and literary material.

Value

What exactly is confusing when the problem arises of distinguishing between two concepts? First of all, that ignoramuses and ignoramuses are paronyms, so we will not have the patience of the reader and will immediately explain what distinguishes one from another. Nevene is a man uncultured and ill-bred. For example, one who can blow his nose on the street and, without embarrassment, continue his journey.

Ace Ventura as an example of intentional ignorance

Remember the wonderful film "Ace Ventura: The Search for Pets" (1994)? There, the protagonist at the dinner party, which was given by one of the suspects in the theft of Snowball, showed the whole spectrum of ignorant behavior. And the most interesting thing is that Ace appeared in the role of ignoramus. The detective was so uncultured that there was nowhere else to go. For example, he interrupted the owner of the house, mocked the butler, guests. And in general, behaved disgustingly. One could have thought that the hero was brought up by wild beasts, not people. However, we are distracted. In other words, for those who are interested in the question: "Unwell and ignorant - what are their differences?", You can recall Ace, and everything will immediately become clear. Ace is a lazy person. He is an example of an ill-mannered person. True, his rudeness is manageable and thought out. As, however, and madness.

Master and Ivan Homeless

Ace gives us an example of ignorance of everyday life. But if we want to understand ignorance intellectual, then we need to turn to the great Russian literature. M.A. Bulgakov in the epic novel "The Master and Margarita" is an episode when in the mental hospital Ivan Bezdomny tells how he met the devil at the Patriarchs, and from the master hears in response a remark about the cultural ignorance of the poet. Yes, and in this case, as the reader has guessed, Ivan Bezdomny is an ignoramus. Ignorance is a person who is not knowledgeable in any field. It is about the lack of education of a person. Now, we think, there are no problems to distinguish between the two concepts of "ignoramus" and "ignoramus" and not to be confused anymore.

Sherlock Holmes as an example of an extraordinary ignoramus

There is one more character that is suitable for our purpose. This is Sherlock Holmes. In the series "Acquaintance", which was filmed in 1979 in the USSR, there is a wonderful dialogue with Dr. Watson, where the great detective confesses that he does not take novels in his hands, he does not read books on history. He even (to the horror of Watson) does not know who Copernicus is. Holmes even questioned that the Earth revolves around the Sun, and not the other way round (so at least the daily empirical experience tells us). The reader can easily say to which class of people the detective belongs. Of course, we are talking about the definitions of "ignoramus" and "ignoramuses". The meaning of both one and the other word does not seem more a mystery to the reader, for we explained a lot of the interpretation of their meaning.

Returning to Holmes, I want to say that he, perhaps, is the only person who has an ideological justification of his ignorance. He says that the brain is an attic, and an intelligent person keeps only the most necessary things in it, the fool drags everything that he can get there. In the words of Holmes has its own logic and even its own aesthetics. But Dr. Watson does not feel it and laments over what would have happened to the world, if everyone, like Holmes, thought. But Holmes calms a friend and colleague and says that perhaps he is the only one in the world. One way or another, the difference between "ignoramus" and "ignoramus" is clear, it is difficult to confuse these concepts, knowing their semantic content.

On the Relativity of Definitions

It is bad to be both ignorant and ignorant. It's sad when a person is uncultured and like a wild beast. But still, ignorance is more terrible than intellectual, educational ignorance. Because social maturity and the ability to meet the expectations of other people, for example, brushing your teeth, changing clothes on time, using a handkerchief, not a sleeve, are necessary conditions for normal human communication. Boorishness is much more difficult to overcome than non-enlightenment. Parenting is something that parents should take care of. If, for example, a person is accustomed to chomping at a table or in another way is noisy, then any notation can be powerless, because habit is the second nature.

Ignorance in an intellectual sense is overcome relatively easily when a person has a desire to learn. History knows a lot of examples of people who have done a great job on themselves. Now it is very fashionable, when there is an occasion and when it is not there, to remember Joseph Brodsky. Indeed, the Russian poet is a man who created himself.

Asking yourself who is ignorant and ignorant, it is important to remember this seemingly elusive difference between the definitions of a person, however, if you dig a little deeper, then the difference from one to the other becomes obvious, and the reader will never again get confused. What we wish him.