Good inexpensive monitor: review, specifications, manufacturers and reviews

Choosing a monitor is not an easy thing. To buy a successful device, you need to weigh the pros and cons. Here you should look for not just an inexpensive monitor, but also the necessary diagonal, the manufacturer, the type of matrix and much more. At the same time, the display market is now so huge that it is possible to choose a good gaming monitor for little money, but it is difficult because of the variety.

Criteria

Before we look at a couple of popular models, we find out by what criteria it is necessary to choose them. The first thing a buyer should look at is the size. Depending on the purpose, you should choose for yourself a comfortable diagonal display. The next criterion is ergonomics and appearance. For some it may seem unimportant, while others, on the contrary, are paramount.

Then we look at the permissions. They can be very diverse, especially when it comes to the latest models of WQHD and UltraHD. These are the most popular criteria that the buyer pays attention to. But we must not forget about the parameters of the device. An inexpensive good monitor should still have a high-quality matrix, high viewing angles, moderate contrast, brightness and so on.

Diagonal

Selection by this criterion is important for every user. Of course, the size of the screen will depend on the cost, so if we are considering a budget segment, reviewing displays with a diagonal of more than 30 inches does not make sense. In general, the dimensions of the simplest screen fluctuate around 18-20 inches. This is a budget option, which is more common in offices. A low price allows you to purchase such devices for employees.

For a mass segment, a monitor with a diagonal of up to 24 inches is ideal. This is a popular option that ordinary users use for home, among these models there are game options. The 27-inch models are no longer a low-cost device.

Reviews recommend that you still look at the models for 24 inches. First, there are both expensive models of this size, and inexpensive monitors. Secondly, the convenience of such dimensions positively affects the use. Thirdly, displays usually live more than 10 years, so it is better to immediately acquire a promising option, so as not to change the screen every couple of years.

Design

This criterion may not matter to the user or play an important role. Recently, there are often screens without frames or with a very thin edging. It looks fashionable and beautiful. You can consider the available connectors on the monitor, the presence of adjustment buttons, lights and much more.

Some buyers need the screen to be easy to adjust. His position in this case can be changed in different directions. The display rises, turns on all four sides, bends, etc.

Resolution

Another important parameter is resolution. It all depends on what tasks the monitor will perform for the computer. Inexpensive, you can buy a device with the standard HD or FullHD. There are also variants of WQHD and UltraHD. To make the picture look good, you need to find a balanced resolution for it with respect to the diagonal. If you purchase a 30-inch monitor, but with HD resolution, the image will be pixelated and blurry.

In addition to this parameter, consider the aspect ratio. Now there are still "square" models on sale, which are very unprofitable now to buy. The most popular ratio is 16: 9. According to reviews it is convenient for both designers and computer games.

Options

Next, pay attention to the technical specifications. The matrix also influences many indicators, such as contrast, quality, graininess, brightness, etc. But it should be immediately said that there is no ideal matrix. Devices with TN are designed for budget models. This is the simplest and most uncomfortable option.

PVA and MVA - a universal matrix for home monitors. Models with it have low cost, good speed and good contrast. IPS is an expensive variant of the matrix, which, although it does not convey a realistic picture, is notable for accurate color reproduction, high contrast. Ideal for photographers and graphic editors.

In addition to the matrix, we can consider the speed of response. This option is most important for gamers. Usually, almost all gaming monitors react with a speed of 1 ms. Another okologeymersky parameter - the refresh rate. An inexpensive monitor for games is unlikely to get 144 Hz, although for players this is an ideal option.

Despite this, if you are a beginner gamer, you can choose a display from 60 Hz. If at the same time you have a high-quality system, productive, with a good graphics card, then such a refresh rate will be enough.

Models

By 2017, the choice of the budget model does not cause difficulties. Similar options are presented by all manufacturers who create this product. So, to buy inexpensive monitors for a computer in Moscow, Kiev or Minsk can be almost at every step. Next, we'll look at a couple of popular budget options, not just for everyday use, but for work and entertainment.

Philips

This manufacturer presents a large number of inexpensive models. So, for 111 dollars you can buy 200V4LSB. The budget cost is dictated by the inexpensive matrix TFT TN, the diagonal is only 20 inches, while the response time is 5 ms. For gamers, of course, the option is not the best, but testimonials indicate that it will be good for home use.

223V5LSB is a very similar model, but, as the name suggests, it got a slightly larger diagonal - 22 inches. 226V4LAB 22-inch monitor, which will cost you 120 dollars. All specified models practically do not differ in appearance. They do not have a fashionable frameless design or unimaginable adjustment parameters. But for this cost more is not worth waiting for.

Samsung

Samsung also offers inexpensive monitors. And the options are sufficient. LS19F350H is a very compact model with a diagonal of 19 inches. Despite the simplest resolution - 1366x768 pixels, which you can not boast of, the company decided to stand out as a good matrix PLS. But in general, according to reviews, the model is most suitable for office workers.

The S22F350F is a more advanced version that connects thanks to the convenient HDMI interface. Relative to the previous model, the diagonal increased to 22 inches. Better was the resolution - 1920x1080 pixels. In this case only the TN matrix was summed up, although with such a resolution it looks worthy.

But LS22E390HSO stands out among all its appearance. There is an imitation of frameless models. The stand was reliable, but refined. This is the best model among those surveyed. This is due to the support of the digital HDMI interface, and the presence of a high-quality matrix PLS, and complements this all resolution 1920x1080.

ASUS

It's hard to imagine any segment without products from ASUS. Inexpensive monitor in this case is represented by the model VX229H. Despite the seemingly ordinary, at first glance, appearance, the display stands out among all. Above and on the sides there is almost no frame. From the bottom, a wide panel received functional buttons and a company logo. An interesting shape and a stand for the screen.

Characteristics such a model has averages. But the main advantage is the IPS matrix. The massive diagonal size - 22 inches is supplemented by a resolution of 1920x1080. The response rate is 5 ms. Of course, an imperfect option for gamers, as the reviews say, but still someone just like it.

Studio

Analyzing inexpensive studio monitors, many can present displays for those who work in the studio. But in fact, monitors in this case are columns that are presented individually. There are many parameters by which the necessary model is chosen. But since the choice of this device is limited, in comparison with the screens for the computer, then most often there appear the same models.

The Yamaha HS50M is a good option, which according to reviews is ideal for electronic music, it is advisable to use it in combination with a subwoofer. Behringer Truth B1030A is a great speaker, which is suitable for a DJ monitor. Therefore, some experts are against this model falling into the segment of studio monitors.

Mackie MR5 MK2 showed itself as a model of the golden mean. A small imbalance of frequencies was noted. Not bad showed themselves bass. Pioneer S-DJ50X, thanks to its eminent manufacturer, remains a good budget option. Refers to the initial level, it is recommended to DJs for training in the home studio.