What is common between architecture and music? Interconnection

"Architecture - this is frozen music" - this winged expression first burst out of the mouth of Frederick William Joseph Schellings in 1842. Since then, many have begun to notice the relationship between these two kinds of art. Let us also learn what is common between architecture and music, what aspects they unite and why this statement played such an important role in philosophy and aesthetics.

Melody - what is it?

Before we thoroughly know what is common between music and architecture, let us briefly review the main points of each of these arts. The first one in turn will be directly a melody, a song, a work that we can hear. What does it consist of? First of all, this is the rhythm, size, pace, strokes. These aspects determine the mood of the melody, create this or that atmosphere. Moreover, in music there are numerous shades, plastic, it has a beginning and an end, an exposition and a culmination. However, all this terminology is familiar, perhaps, only to musicians - professionals and amateurs, but how do ordinary listeners define and distinguish music? They catch her style. It is this moment that is key, at the expense of which musical tastes and preferences are formed. It is the genre in which this or that song is written, the play, the sonata, the romance, etc., can create a certain mood, atmosphere, aura.

Characteristics of architecture

We can begin to talk about what is common between architecture and music, after we learn the interpretation of the second term. About what architecture is, even a first-grader can tell. These are all the buildings that surround us, ranging from ancient, pompous and majestic churches and mansions, ending with modern - post-Soviet new buildings and high-rise glass. Architecture, as we see, is divided into a lot of genres that are very different from each other. She also has her own "color", which creates a certain mood. Due to the development in this or that style, a certain aura and mood is created. In their creations, architects always express their own creative abilities, they give the world a piece of their soul.

What is the difference?

Before we proceed to discuss the question of what is common between architecture and music, we will establish for themselves their differences. First, architecture is a "frozen" art, which is stable. Any construction is always static, they can be admired endlessly, without taking their eyes off, it does not start and does not end - it simply is. As for music, then any work has an introductory part, a culmination and an ending. Enjoy the melody until you hear the last note. Secondly, any structures, on which architects and builders worked, are designed for our eyes. We can look at them, admire, view and take pictures. But music - art, caught by the ears. Having heard a certain set of sounds, our brain collects them into a single melody, which we can enjoy for a short time.

Aesthetic similarities

Art - this "vulture" unites such concepts in our life as music and architecture. At first glance, what do these branches have in common? To create a building in a certain style or work for a tool requires a creator. In the first case, this is an architect, in the second - a composer. But both are creative individuals who think in the same way and pour their talents on paper. The similarity is the second style. As already noted above, any structure has its own "color", and the same can be said about musical pieces. Moreover, in music and architecture genres strongly echo. For example, the Baroque style, represented in architecture by Carlo Moderna, and in music by Antonio Lucho Vivaldi. Throughout the centuries, the process of changing epochs and their philosophy has affected all spheres of art. They seemed to be in step with the times, so they had similar features.

Technical similarities

It is necessary to turn to the theory to know exactly what architecture and music have in common from a technical point of view. First, consider the size. In musical works, it is always indicated at the very beginning of the musical camp. It can be 2/4, ¾, 6/8 and so on. The size depends on the rhythm of the work, its emotional color and style (i.e. 4/4 is a march, ¾ is a waltz and a minuet, etc.). In different buildings, size is also important. Here we mean not only the height of the building, its width and length. Also important are the sizes and frequency of windows, doors, columns, portals and arches, forms and transitions are important. Aspect of the second - strokes. In music, they are known by such terms as staccato (abruptly, abruptly) and legato (smoothly, slowly). In a frozen form such strokes we see in architecture. Anyone can distinguish a building that has a sharp, deliberate character from a house created on the basis of smooth, flowing lines and transitions.

Physics is the main science

Many skeptics refuse to understand why architecture is often called frozen music, until they see scientific proof. And everything lies in the old Russian system of fathoms, according to which our ancestors built houses, churches and public buildings. It's no secret that our world is a set of waves that resonate in the area of specific objects at a particular frequency. Due to the construction of walls at a certain distance from each other, electromagnetic columns are formed, which are combined into chords. It is believed that it was the fathoming system that made it possible to create such energy structures that enabled people to feel better in the room: pressure was normalized, various pains subsided. Why did this happen? The fact is that the frequency of the emissions of such electromagnetic columns that combined into "chords" had a similar frequency with certain notes that can be reproduced on any instrument.

If asked at school, what is common between architecture and music

Compositions on such topics are rarely given as assignments to secondary school students, but in specialized schools such a question can become relevant. In such cases, the complex aspects of physics and mathematics, of course, are not considered. Children are taught only common, aesthetic similarities. Mentioned above, they are the key answer to this question, after all, it's all about the two kinds of art.