The sociology of the city, or what kind of danger, is life in the metropolis?

From the point of view of sociology the city is an absolutely new form of association of a society based on relations between people. Sociology of the city and the village, of course, differ from each other, those changes that occur primarily in production and have their own content. They are based on industrial types of labor that are otherwise related to the natural environment and differ from agriculture.
Sociology of the city, built on the fact that, here nature is not a direct subject of work, while industrial production is concentrated around large markets. The sociology of the city and the village is built on their separation, the final result of which is the distribution of labor in industrial and agricultural. Moreover, the sociology of the city provides more opportunities for engaging in mental work, such as high urbanization requires products of intellectual activity that must also be produced by someone .

The city is an autonomous entity with the possibility of self-determination, which concerns the place of its origin. This is due to the fact that natural factors are less influential to him than to the village. The sociology of the city is due to the intensive development of the territories, which is connected with the urban production, creating prerequisites for this. The production process concentrates on the limited areas of the urban and suburban lines.

The growth of large cities is connected with potential shifts in the technical sphere and the restructuring of the economic model. Turning to increasingly new technologies, cities are transformed into mega-cities, where it is much more profitable to create production associations, retail outlets, cultural complexes, educational institutions. Labor productivity is an order of magnitude higher and growth will continue until it is economically viable.

Living in a megacity irreversibly able to change the person himself, as well as the perception of nature, a large city forever changes the psyche of the individual. This carries a hidden threat, since the sociology of the city, comes into conflict with the nature of man at the genetic level.
To try to avoid this, it is necessary to understand what the sociology of everyday life is and create conditions for the rationalization of nature and man in a megacity. This will be possible if two important factors are observed:
1. Development of a promising scheme of a metropolis, based on the principle of rationality of nature. BUT compliance with this principle, will come into conflict with the personal interests of individual individuals, or groups organizing production and engaged in commerce. They will do everything in order to impede its realization.
2. Management of a megacity should be carried out by means of the competent and strong management which will direct a city, overcoming corruption and egoism.

The sociology of the city is determined by methods and ways of solving social and economic problems, housing, household, communal problems. The solution of these issues is aimed at creating an enabling environment for citizens' lives.
The beginning to create an enabling environment for life is a rational,
Thoughtful implementation of changes in planning, architecture, improvement of domestic and cultural objects. Architects should carefully design the building complexes for their successful combination, in order to avoid spontaneous building that will disfigure the face of the city, or interfere with the normal functioning of other services aimed at fulfilling public needs.

The city serves as a place for the unification of many people from different regions, countries, as well as visitors from other countries, whose competent life support lies on the shoulders of governing bodies, whose competent actions, in turn, not only determine the functioning of the megalopolis, but also the mental state of its inhabitants .